At the end of my Cure Money Madness talk last month, I had a great opportunity to dissect a common—though complex—money madness situation. On the last day, a 50 year-old man came up to the podium and said, “I’m not sure if I have money madness.” He went on to share that he hadn’t filed a tax return in almost a decade, not only to avoid taxes, but also to avoid the hassle of completing an administrative form.

After we talked about some numbers, he publicly confessed what he already suspected, and what I knew—that he wasn’t actually saving much money by not filing. Then, he blurted out, “I’ve also kept my income low all these years so I’d be below the IRS’ radar – too small a fish for them to fry…But now I’ve spent my small inheritance and am struggling to make ends meet.”

“OK,” I responded, “let’s get clear about what your money madness drives you to do. First, earn less money than you’re capable of earning. Second, reject work that would increase your net worth and refuse to ask for better compensation for the work you’re doing. Third, shirk your legal obligation to pay taxes.”

He agreed that this was a fair assessment, so we explored the money messages on which this behavior was built. Three important messages emerged.
1. The “system” is unfair, and a hassle, to boot.
2. You should get away with something if you can
3.Not paying taxes makes perfect sense, given #1 and #2.

Curing money madness begins with examining the costs of money madness. In this case, money madness locked him into making less than he needed to live, into doing uninteresting work that didn’t capitalize on his genius qualities and into a constant state of stress at the specter of being caught by the IRS.

Then, he had to accept the numbers we’d just looked at, and truly understand that while he might have avoided an end-of-the-year check to the IRS, what he avoided in earnings was far greater than any taxes could ever have been.

Next, he had to make the connection between not paying taxes and his self-confidence.  One consequence of the system he’d concocted was that he lived a smaller, less public, more limited professional life, which no doubt affected his personal life, too. His system both reinforced and created low self-esteem. He had to see that the whole thing was, for him, a way to avoid personal pain, yet a source of the very pain he was trying to avoid.

Many of us operate on the principle that money is somehow antithetical to peace. We talk about having jobs that are well-paying or ethical, companies that are “corporate” and therefore bad. We seek guidance from spiritual leaders who took vows of poverty and religious verses condemning the lust for money. We focus on finding tranquility by releasing our attachment to the material world, in which money plays a starring role.

But what if the truth—money vs. peace, profit vs. ethics—just isn’t that black and white?

Consider MoveOn.org. With 3.3 million members, MoveOn.org has used Internet-based, grassroots community organizing to raise many millions of dollars. Those funds have paid for things like Viacom billboards reading “Inspections Work. War Won’t.” in major cities across the country, thousands of phone calls to Congress in advance of votes on torture and the war in Iraq, and DC rallies with tens of thousands of attendees exhorting the government to take action against genocide in Darfur.

From Patagonia to the Peace Corps to The Desmond Tutu Peace Foundation, there are thousands of organizations creating and supporting peace using not just volunteers and vision, but money. Cold, hard cash. Lean, mean green. (By the way—just look at the words we use to talk about money: cold, hard, and mean!)

The fact of the matter is that money is powerful, but it’s neither good nor bad—it’s neutral. As neutral as a spoon, a wheelbarrow, a paperclip. It’s simply a tool, and like all tools, it can be used for good or ill. A hammer can crash down on your finger or build a house. Fire can burn down your garden or cook your meals. Money can generate suffering, or it can generate peace and progress; and rejecting money because it can cause suffering is like refusing a hammer while building your house because you might accidentally hit your finger.

Rather than struggle to reject money because it’s bad, embrace money as a neutral tool, only as constructive or destructive as our intentions. The nature and scope of its power directly depend on how we use it.

In our progressive communities, many of us have a negative knee-jerk reaction to money. That reaction keeps us from seeing that money creates opportunities to improve the world. When we don’t see the benevolent, constructive side of money, we reject it, and those opportunities are lost.

Get clear on the neutrality of money, and you’ll create possibilities. Possibilities lead to opportunities. Opportunities lead to change. And in the hands of the progressive community, change leads to peace.