MONEY MATTERS

Posted on December 1st, 2008 in Family, General, Investing, Kids, Money Madness | Leave A Comment

HOW TO GET YOUR FAMILY’S FINANCES IN ORDER—NOW!—FOR 2009

Listen up, parents: It’s time to get your finances in order. With the  new year fast approaching, there’s no time like the present to take  action. Not only will being proactive about your money situation make for a calmer, happier, and, ultimately, more successful year,  but it will get your kids on the right track while they’re still young,  setting them up to have a healthy relationship with the the almighty  dollar for the rest of their lives.

Our kids inherit more than our eye color and height—they also inherit how we think about money and how we behave with money. If, for example, you use money to feel good (buying a new sweater after a bad day, buying your kid a toy when you feel distant from her) you are literally teaching your kids that buying more things will somehow, eventually, fix the problem. They, too, will begin to feel a sense of deprivation—after all, if you did have enough, why would you need to constantly acquire more?  They’ll also begin to believe a particularly problematic falsehood: the best way to ease discomfort is to make a purchase. It won’t be long before their own behavior mirrors the messages they got from mom and dad.

Rather than head down this road for yet another 12 months, take advantage of the New Year to get clear with yourself and with your kids about what your spending and saving will look like for 2009. Why is it important to include your children in this process rather than just let them figure out on their own that your spending is changing? There are two reasons. First, if you are up front with you’re kids about how you choose to spend the family money, they won’t create negative, imaginary reasons for the change.  Just as children of divorce often invent that they are to blame for their parents’ split, children in homes with suddenly- tighter purse strings may come up with destructive, unhappy and untrue causes  for the shift.   Second, if your children feel they are a part of the decision process rather than serfs to your financial decrees, they are less likely to rebel or develop a negative attitude. This is particularly true of older kids.

So how do you decide what needs to be done in the New Year, and how do you talk about it with your kids?

Here are my 6 Top Tips for Creating Financial Family Fitness in 2009:

1 First and foremost: Before getting together with the kids, if you have a partner, share with him or her the money message you got from your parents so that each of you knows what inherited money beliefs you each bring to the table. You may be working with the basic belief that the love of money is the root of all evil, while your partner is positive that money makes the world go ‘round. If you don’t have a partner, have this talk with a friend. Recognize that our adult money activities are driven by childhood beliefs. This understanding can help you turn any judgments you may have about your own or your partner’s money habits into compassion.
2 Spending IntentionComplete a Spending Intention worksheet with your partner—this gives you a clear picture of your actual cash flow and allows you to create a spending range for each category of expenses. And, if one of you tends to hand over the reigns when it comes to family finances (happily or begrudgingly), this will help to restore some balance.
3 Remember the value—and yes, the fun—of saving. Our grandparents generally couldn’t overspend much because they didn’t have Visas and Mastercards. If they wanted something, they typically paid cash up front, or (drumroll please) saved for it. Restore this practice with your children. Give them the experience of anticipation, excitement, and accomplishment that comes from saving, and experience it yourself by helping out. If there is something your kids really want this year—a bike, a trip to Disneyland—instead of using the credit card to buy it, develop a matching savings plan. If they save five dollars, you add 10.
4 Speaking of credit cards, let them go. It is wise to keep one or two on hand for emergencies and credit cards can play a role in restoring damaged credit. But generally, they should function as a spare tire, not a steering wheel. Overusing credit cards not only plants you firmly in the debt cycle, it’s teaching your kids—and yourself—that saving is essentially impossible or useless, and that you can have whatever you want whenever you want it. The thorny truth is that you can’t—not without paying the price in interest, stress, and the growing sense that you don’t have enough. If we want our kids to be patient and wise spenders, credit cards are teaching them the opposite values.
5 Sit down for a family money meeting, but take care to strike an information balance. Too much financial information stresses kids out. They don’t need to know all the details of your mortgage, the raise that didn’t come through, or the 401K that’s losing traction. If your intention is to decrease family spending, tell the kids how you are going to cut back and invite them to come up with ways that they can reduce the family’s spending as well. It’s beautiful to witness how children can step into greater maturity and responsibility when their ideas are taken seriously.
6 Finally—and trust me on this—there is nothing that will improve a family’s sense of security and wellness more than giving to others. It is the quickest way to dissolve a sense of not having enough or needing more. Generosity necessarily undermines our feeling of scarcity and sufficiency blossoms. So sit down, put your heads together, and select a beneficiary and an appropriate amount.

The Quality Products Paradox

Posted on February 1st, 2008 in Money Madness, Taxes | Leave A Comment

If you pay more, you get more.

That’s the standard formula, the common wisdom. Buy the basic product for one price, the better-performing deluxe product with extra features for a higher price, and the super-deluxe wow-performance product with every possible bell and whistle for top dollar. More money equals more value, right?  I haven’t found it so.

I bought a watch complete with electronic compass, ten alarms, and altimeter. After a few months, the altimeter still worked but the fixed time was correct only twice a day, and I needed to haul the operating manual around with me to figure out how to work the alarms.

I upgraded from a boom box to a full stereo system and discovered that the antenna on the full system was inferior-full-system users are expected to be CD-listeners, not radio fans–and I couldn’t hear my favorite FM station.

The interior-lighting salesperson sold us on a push-button, dimmable scene-programming system for our kitchen to replace the standard on/off switches. Well, yes, we could create many more moods with the scene lighting, but we couldn’t stop the constant, maddening flickering. Until we replaced the fancy, cinematography-ready system with a more conventional one, our solution was to use the kitchen only while the sun was up.

At the clothing store, when I said I assumed the six-hundred-dollar suit would last longer than the three-hundred-dollar suit, the salesman introduced me to the facts of fashion. No, he said. Actually, because the six-hundred-dollar suit is made of finer material, it will wear out sooner. And since it’s the latest style, it’ll become obsolete earlier.

Yes, lunch at The Four Seasons tastes better than at any diner, my $400 blender does a phenomenal job making smoothies, and our $300 ceiling fan is a lot quieter than the $49 fan it replaced. But many times, adding new! and improved! features to a basically successful product seems only to compromise the product’s integrity and undermine its original purpose.

It’s certainly true for investment products.

A typical S&P Index fund-the investing world’s “basic product”-usually costs about 0.3% per year or less; that’s an annual expense of $30 for every $10,000 invested. The fund has no bells and whistles; it’s just a lamp with a light bulb. It won’t claim to protect you in a down market or shift all your money to the technology sector if that’s where the “smart money” is going. You know exactly what you’re getting: an average return of 11% per year by staying invested in a cross-section of the largest 500 U.S. companies.

But, wait, what if you increase your expenses to 1.5% per year, or $150 for every $10,000 invested, and try to do what academic studies show can’t be done -that is, beat the market? The extra bucks will buy you the bells and whistles of lots of trading, racing around trying to time the market, rotating assets from one sector to another, or ditching the stock with which you’ve become disenchanted in favor of the new “hot pick.”

In so doing, of course, you actually increase the taxes you owe because of all the turnover. And so what if 80% of these active funds under-perform? You’ve got the dimmable scene-programming lighting design that is sexier than the basic product (i.e., the S&P index fund), but is it worth it? Put simply, no.

Think about it. At least five-times the extra money for less performance means less money for retirement. Excuse me, but I’ll take the lower cost, no-frills investment and use some of the savings and extra performance for lighting I can see by-and for the occasional lunch at the Four Seasons…